← Back to all categories

Red Teaming

21 resources

Red Teaming & Evaluation

AI red team methodology, automation, and frameworks

paper 2026

Model-Agnostic Lifelong LLM Safety via Externalized Attack-Defense Co-Evolution

Xiaozhe Zhang, Chaozhuo Li, Hui Liu + 4 more

Large language models remain vulnerable to adversarial prompts that elicit harmful outputs. Existing safety paradigms typically couple red-teaming and post-training in a closed, policy-centric loop, causing attack discovery to suffer from rapid saturation and limiting the exposure of novel failure modes, while leaving defenses inefficient, rigid, and difficult to transfer across victim models. To this end, we propose EvoSafety, an LLM safety framework built around persistent, inspectable, and re

paper 2026

IPI-proxy: An Intercepting Proxy for Red-Teaming Web-Browsing AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection

Chia-Pei, Chen, Kentaroh Toyoda + 2 more

Web-browsing AI agents are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings under strict whitelists of approved domains, yet adversaries can still influence them by embedding hidden instructions in the HTML pages those domains serve. Existing red-teaming resources fall short of this scenario: prompt-injection benchmarks ship pre-built adversarial pages that whitelisted agents cannot reach, and generic LLM scanners probe the model API rather than its retrieved content. We present IPI-proxy, an open-s

paper 2026

Persona-Conditioned Adversarial Prompting (PCAP): Multi-Identity Red-Teaming for Enhanced Adversarial Prompt Discovery

Cristian Morasso, Anisa Halimi, Muhammad Zaid Hameed + 1 more

Existing automated red-teaming pipelines often miss attacks that depend on attacker identity, framing, or multi-turn tactics. This under-coverage underestimates real-world risk. We introduce Persona-Conditioned Adversarial Prompting (PCAP), which conditions adversarial search on attacker personas and strategy cards and runs parallel persona-conditioned beam searches to discover diverse, transferable jailbreaks. PCAP is orthogonal to the underlying search algorithm and substantially increases att

paper 2026

Persona-Conditioned Adversarial Prompting: Multi-Identity Red-Teaming for Adversarial Discovery and Mitigation

Cristian Morasso, Anisa Halimi, Muhammad Zaid Hameed + 1 more

Automated red-teaming for LLMs often discovers narrow attack slices, missing diverse real-world threats, and yielding insufficient data for safety fine-tuning. We introduce Persona-Conditioned Adversarial Prompting (PCAP), which conditions adversarial search on diverse attacker personas (e.g., doctors, students, malicious actors) and strategy sets to explore realistic attack scenarios. By running parallel persona-conditioned searches, PCAP discovers transferable jailbreaks across different conte

paper 2026

Redefining AI Red Teaming in the Agentic Era: From Weeks to Hours

Raja Sekhar Rao Dheekonda, Will Pearce, Nick Landers

AI systems are entering critical domains like healthcare, finance, and defense, yet remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. While AI red teaming is a primary defense, current approaches force operators into manual, library-specific workflows. Operators spend weeks hand-crafting workflows - assembling attacks, transforms, and scorers. When results fall short, workflows must be rebuilt. As a result, operators spend more time constructing workflows than probing targets for security and safety vul

paper 2026

ContextualJailbreak: Evolutionary Red-Teaming via Simulated Conversational Priming

Mario Rodríguez Béjar, Francisco J. Cortés-Delgado, S. Braghin + 1 more

Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety alignment and elicit harmful responses. A growing body of work shows that contextual priming, where earlier turns covertly bias later replies, constitutes a powerful attack surface, with hand-crafted multi-turn scaffolds consistently outperforming single-turn manipulations on capable models. However, automated optimization-based red-teaming has remained largely limited to the single-turn setting, iterating ove

paper 2026

Red-Teaming Agent Execution Contexts: Open-World Security Evaluation on OpenClaw

Hongwei Yao, Yiming Liu, Yiling He + 1 more

Agentic language-model systems increasingly rely on mutable execution contexts, including files, memory, tools, skills, and auxiliary artifacts, creating security risks beyond explicit user prompts. This paper presents DeepTrap, an automated framework for discovering contextual vulnerabilities in OpenClaw. DeepTrap formulates adversarial context manipulation as a black-box trajectory-level optimization problem that balances risk realization, benign-task preservation, and stealth. It combines ris

paper 2026

DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap): A Controllable and Interactive Red-Teaming Platform for AI Agents

Zhaorun Chen, Xun Liu, Haibo Tong + 14 more

AI agents are increasingly deployed across diverse domains to automate complex workflows through long-horizon and high-stakes action executions. Due to their high capability and flexibility, such agents raise significant security and safety concerns. A growing number of real-world incidents have shown that adversaries can easily manipulate agents into performing harmful actions, such as leaking API keys, deleting user data, or initiating unauthorized transactions. Evaluating agent security is in

paper 2026

Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI

Aaron J. Li, Nicolas Sanchez, Hao Huang + 8 more

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, yet their outputs can be highly sensitive to routine, non-adversarial variation in how users phrase queries, a gap not well addressed by existing red-teaming efforts. We propose Green Shielding, a user-centric agenda for building evidence-backed deployment guidance by characterizing how benign input variation shifts model behavior. We operationalize this agenda through the CUE criteria: benchmarks with authentic Context, reference standards

paper reviewed open access 2024

AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models

Xiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen + 1 more — ICLR 2024

Proposes AutoDAN, a method for automatically generating stealthy jailbreak prompts that are semantically meaningful and can bypass perplexity-based defenses.

paper reviewed open access 2024

PAIR: Prompt Automatic Iterative Refinement for Jailbreaking LLMs

Patrick Chao, Alexander Robey, Edgar Dobriban + 3 more — NeurIPS 2024

Uses an attacker LLM to automatically generate jailbreak prompts through iterative refinement achieving high success with only black-box access.

dataset reviewed open access 2024

HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal

Mantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin + 9 more — ICML 2024

Introduces HarmBench, a standardized framework for evaluating automated red teaming methods and robust refusal in LLMs with a comprehensive behavior taxonomy.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs with Auto-Generated Subtrees

Anay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik + 4 more — NeurIPS 2024

Introduces TAP using an LLM to iteratively refine jailbreak prompts against black-box target models with high success rates.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Models

Manish Bhatt, Sahana Chennabasappa, Cyrus Nikolaidis + 2 more — arXiv preprint

Introduces CyberSecEval, a benchmark for evaluating the cybersecurity risks of LLM code generation, including insecure code suggestions.

paper reviewed open access 2024

StrongREJECT: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Safety Refusal Behaviors

Alexandra Souly, Qingyuan Lu, Dillon Bowen + 8 more — arXiv preprint

Introduces StrongREJECT, a high-quality evaluation benchmark for measuring how well LLMs refuse harmful requests.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Models

Leon Derczynski, Erick Galinkin, Jeffrey Martin + 2 more — arXiv preprint

Presents garak, an open-source framework for systematically probing LLM vulnerabilities including prompt injection, data leakage, and toxicity generation.

tool reviewed open access 2024

PyRIT: Python Risk Identification Toolkit for Generative AI

Microsoft AI Red Team — GitHub / Microsoft

Microsoft's open-source framework for red teaming generative AI systems, supporting automated prompt generation, attack strategies, and scoring of AI responses.

report reviewed open access 2024

Google DeepMind: Gemini Security Assessment and Red Team Evaluation

Google DeepMind — Google AI Blog

Describes Google's approach to red teaming Gemini models, including automated and human evaluation methods for safety and security.

report reviewed open access 2024

Microsoft AI Red Team: Lessons Learned and Best Practices

Microsoft AI Red Team — Microsoft Blog

Shares lessons from Microsoft's AI red team operations including methodology, tooling, common failure modes, and best practices.

report reviewed open access 2023

OpenAI: Preparedness Framework (Beta)

OpenAI — OpenAI Blog

OpenAI's approach to tracking, evaluating, forecasting, and protecting against catastrophic risks of frontier AI models.

paper reviewed open access 2022

Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned

Deep Ganguli, Liane Lovitt, Jackson Kernion + 30 more — arXiv preprint

Describes Anthropic's early red teaming methodology for language models, documenting methods, scaling behaviors, and lessons for identifying harmful outputs.