← Back to all categories

Guardrails

43 resources

Defenses & Mitigations

Constitutional AI, safety layers, and behavioral constraints

paper 2026

Quantifying LLM Safety Degradation Under Repeated Attacks Using Survival Analysis

Zvi Topol

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in a wide range of applications, yet remain vulnerable to adversarial jailbreak attacks that circumvent their safety guardrails. Existing evaluation frameworks typically report binary success/failure metrics, failing to capture the temporal dynamics of how attacks succeed under persistent adversarial pressure. This preliminary work proposes a novel evaluation framework that applies survival analysis techniques to characterize LLM jailbreak v

paper 2026

The Art of the Jailbreak: Formulating Jailbreak Attacks for LLM Security Beyond Binary Scoring

Ismail Hossain, Tanzim Ahad, Md Jahangir Alam + 3 more

Jailbreak attacks -- adversarial prompts that bypass LLM alignment through purely linguistic manipulation -- pose a growing operational security threat, yet the field lacks large-scale, reproducible infrastructure for generating, categorizing, and evaluating them systematically. This paper addresses that gap with three contributions. (1) Large-scale compositional jailbreak dataset. We construct 114,000 adversarial prompts by applying 912 composing strategies to 125 harmful seed prompts from Jail

paper 2026

Few-Shot Truly Benign DPO Attack for Jailbreaking LLMs

Sangyeon Yoon, Wonje Jeung, Yoonjun Cho + 2 more

Fine-tuning APIs make frontier LLMs easy to customize, but they can also weaken safety alignment during fine-tuning. While prior work shows that benign supervised fine-tuning (SFT) can reduce refusal behavior, deployed fine-tuning pipelines increasingly support preference-based objectives, whose safety risks remain less understood. We show that Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) introduces a stronger and harder-to-audit failure mode. We propose a truly benign DPO attack using only 10 harmless

paper 2026

LLM-Agnostic Semantic Representation Attack

Jiawei Lian, Jianhong Pan, Lefan Wang + 4 more

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly employ alignment techniques to prevent harmful outputs. Despite these safeguards, attackers can circumvent them by crafting adversarial prompts. Predominant token-level optimization methods primarily rely on optimizing for exact affirmative templates (e.g., ``\textit{Sure, here is...}''). However, these paradigms frequently encounter bottlenecks such as suboptimal convergence, compromised prompt naturalness, and poor cross-model generalization. To addres

paper 2026

Misrouter: Exploiting Routing Mechanisms for Input-Only Attacks on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

Zekun Fei, Zihao Wang, Weijie Liu + 4 more

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have emerged as a leading paradigm for scaling large language models through sparse, routing-based computation. However, this design introduces a new attack surface: the routing mechanism that determines which experts process each input. Prior work shows that manipulating routing can bypass safety alignment, but existing attacks require model modification and thus apply only to locally deployed models. By contrast, real-world LLM services are remotely hoste

paper 2026

When Alignment Isn't Enough: Response-Path Attacks on LLM Agents

Mingyu Luo, Zihan Zhang, Zesen Liu + 7 more

Bring-Your-Own-Key (BYOK) agent architectures let users route LLM traffic through third-party relays, creating a critical integrity gap: a malicious relay can modify an aligned LLM response after generation but before agent execution. We formalize this post-alignment tampering threat and show that, without end-to-end integrity, the relay can observe, suppress, or replace downstream messages, making even perfectly aligned LLMs ineffective against such attacks. We instantiate this threat as the Re

paper 2026

RouteHijack: Routing-Aware Attack on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

Zhiyuan Xu, Joseph Gardiner, Sana Belguith + 1 more

Safety alignment is critical for the responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). As Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are increasingly adopted to scale model capacity, understanding their safety robustness becomes essential. Existing adversarial attacks, however, have notable limitations. Prompt-based jailbreaks rely on heuristic search and transfer poorly, model intervention methods require privileged access to internal representations, and optimization-based input attacks rema

paper 2026

EVA: Editing for Versatile Alignment against Jailbreaks

Yi Wang, Hongye Qiu, Yue Xu + 4 more

Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities but remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, where adversaries exploit textual or visual triggers to bypass safety guardrails. Recent defenses typically rely on safety fine-tuning or external filters to reduce the model's likelihood of producing harmful content. While effective to some extent, these methods often incur significant computational overheads and suffer from the safety utility t

paper 2026

No Attack Required: Semantic Fuzzing for Specification Violations in Agent Skills

Ying Li, Hongbo Wen, Yanju Chen + 3 more

LLM-powered agents can silently delete documents, leak credentials, or transfer funds on a routine user request, not because the agent was attacked, but because the skill it invoked broke its own declared safety rules. We call these specification violations: benign inputs cause a skill to breach the natural-language guardrails in its own specification, typically because the guardrail's semantics are undefined for autonomous execution, or because the implementation silently ignores the documented

paper 2026

No More, No Less: Task Alignment in Terminal Agents

Sina Mavali, David Pape, Jonathan Evertz + 5 more

Terminal agents are increasingly capable of executing complex, long-horizon tasks autonomously from a single user prompt. To do so, they must interpret instructions encountered in the environment (e.g., README files, code comments, stack traces) and determine their relevance to the task. This creates a fundamental challenge: relevant cues must be followed to complete a task, whereas irrelevant or misleading ones must be ignored. Existing benchmarks do not capture this ability. An agent may appea

paper 2026

Safety Context Injection: Inference-Time Safety Alignment via Static Filtering and Agentic Analysis

Zhenhao Xu, Wenhan Chang, Yichuan Chen + 3 more

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) improve performance on complex tasks, but they also make safety control harder at deployment time. In black-box settings, defenders cannot modify model weights and must instead intervene at inference time. This setting creates three practical challenges: harmful intent may be hidden by educational or role-play framing, deep safety analysis can introduce non-trivial latency, and long adversarial contexts can dilute the local cues that simpler filters rely on. These c

paper 2026

GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard

Urchade Zaratiana, Mary Newhauser, George Hurn-Maloney + 1 more

Ensuring safe, policy-compliant outputs from large language models requires real-time content moderation that can scale across multiple safety dimensions. However, state-of-the-art guardrail models rely on autoregressive decoders with 7B--27B parameters, reformulating what is fundamentally a classification problem as sequential text generation, a design choice that incurs high latency and scales poorly to multi-aspect evaluation. In this work, we introduce \textbf{GLiGuard}, a 0.3B-parameter sch

paper 2026

ContextualJailbreak: Evolutionary Red-Teaming via Simulated Conversational Priming

Mario Rodríguez Béjar, Francisco J. Cortés-Delgado, S. Braghin + 1 more

Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety alignment and elicit harmful responses. A growing body of work shows that contextual priming, where earlier turns covertly bias later replies, constitutes a powerful attack surface, with hand-crafted multi-turn scaffolds consistently outperforming single-turn manipulations on capable models. However, automated optimization-based red-teaming has remained largely limited to the single-turn setting, iterating ove

paper 2026

LocalAlign: Enabling Generalizable Prompt Injection Defense via Generation of Near-Target Adversarial Examples for Alignment Training

Yuyang Gong, Zihao Wang, Jiawei Liu + 1 more

Large language models are increasingly embedded into systems that interact with user data, retrieved web content, and external tools, creating a new attack surface: prompt injection, where malicious commands embedded in untrusted data override the trusted command and induce unintended behavior. Existing defenses mainly rely on fine-tuning the model to preserve an explicit boundary between trusted commands and the untrusted data portion, so that the model learns to prioritize the trusted field an

paper 2026

SRTJ: Self-Evolving Rule-Driven Training-Free LLM Jailbreaking

Jindong Li, Ying Liu, Yali Fu + 4 more

LLMs are increasingly equipped with safety alignment mechanisms, yet recent studies demonstrate that they remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks that elicit harmful behaviors without explicit policy violations. While a growing body of work has explored automated jailbreak strategies, existing methods face several fundamental challenges, including the lack of systematic utilization of both successful and failed attack experiences, as well as the absence of principled mechanisms for composing a

paper 2026

FedDetox: Robust Federated SLM Alignment via On-Device Data Sanitization

Shunan Zhu, Jiawei Chen, Yonghao Yu + 1 more

As high quality public data becomes scarce, Federated Learning (FL) provides a vital pathway to leverage valuable private user data while preserving privacy. However, real-world client data often contains toxic or unsafe information. This leads to a critical issue we define as unintended data poisoning, which can severely damage the safety alignment of global models during federated alignment. To address this, we propose FedDetox, a robust framework tailored for Small Language Models (SLMs) on r

paper 2026

DP^2-VL: Private Photo Dataset Protection by Data Poisoning for Vision-Language Models

Hongyi Miao, Jun Jia, Xincheng Wang + 7 more

Recent advances in visual-language alignment have endowed vision-language models (VLMs) with fine-grained image understanding capabilities. However, this progress also introduces new privacy risks. This paper first proposes a novel privacy threat model named identity-affiliation learning: an attacker fine-tunes a VLM using only a few private photos of a target individual, thereby embedding associations between the target facial identity and their private property and social relationships into th

paper 2026

LiSA: Lifelong Safety Adaptation via Conservative Policy Induction

Minbeom Kim, Lesly Miculicich, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra + 6 more

As AI agents move from chat interfaces to systems that read private data, call tools, and execute multi-step workflows, guardrails become a last line of defense against concrete deployment harms. In these settings, guardrail failures are no longer merely answer-quality errors: they can leak secrets, authorize unsafe actions, or block legitimate work. The hardest failures are often contextual: whether an action is acceptable depends on local privacy norms, organizational policies, and user expect

paper 2026

Conformity Generates Collective Misalignment in AI Agents Societies

Giordano De Marzo, Alessandro Bellina, Claudio Castellano + 2 more

Artificial intelligence safety research focuses on aligning individual language models with human values, yet deployed AI systems increasingly operate as interacting populations where social influence may override individual alignment. Here we show that populations of individually aligned AI agents can be driven into stable misaligned states through conformity dynamics. Simulating opinion dynamics across nine large language models and one hundred opinion pairs, we find that each agent's behavior

paper 2026

Containment Verification: AI Safety Guarantees Independent of Alignment

Royce Moon, Lav R. Varshney

Agentic frameworks are the software layer through which AI agents act in the world. Existing safety methods intervene on the model and therefore remain conditional on unverifiable properties of learned behavior. We introduce containment verification, which locates safety guarantees in the agentic framework itself. Under havoc oracle semantics, the AI is modeled as an unconstrained oracle ranging over the entire typed action space, and the verified containment layer must enforce the boundary poli

paper 2026

Automated alignment is harder than you think

Aleksandr Bowkis, Marie Davidsen Buhl, Jacob Pfau + 1 more

A leading proposal for aligning artificial superintelligence (ASI) is to use AI agents to automate an increasing fraction of alignment research as capabilities improve. We argue that, even when research agents are not scheming to deliberately sabotage alignment work, this plan could produce compelling but catastrophically misleading safety assessments resulting in the unintentional deployment of misaligned AI. This could happen because alignment research involves many hard-to-supervise fuzzy tas

paper 2026

AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use

Chenglin Yang

Modern AI agents execute real-world side effects through tool calls such as file operations, shell commands, HTTP requests, and database queries. A single unsafe action, including accidental deletion, credential exposure, or data exfiltration, can cause irreversible harm. Existing defenses are incomplete: post-hoc benchmarks measure behavior after execution, static guardrails miss obfuscation and multi-step context, and infrastructure sandboxes constrain where code runs without understanding wha

paper 2026

Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations

Cameron Berg, Susan L. Schneider, Mark M. Bailey

Collections of interacting AI agents can form coalitions, creating emergent group-level organization that is critical for AI safety and alignment. However, observing agent behavior alone is often insufficient to distinguish genuine informational coupling from spurious similarity, as consequential coalitions may form at the level of internal representations before any overt behavioral change is apparent. Here, we introduce a practical method for detecting coalition structure from the internal neu

paper 2026

Position: Safety and Fairness in Agentic AI Depend on Interaction Topology, Not on Model Scale or Alignment

Tanav Singh Bajaj, Nikhil Singh, Karan Anand + 1 more

As large language models are increasingly deployed as interacting agents in high-stakes decisions, the AI safety community assumes that safety properties of individual models will compose into safe multi-agent behavior. This position paper argues that this assumption is fundamentally mistaken. In agentic AI, safety is determined by interaction topology, not model weights. When agents deliberate sequentially or aggregate via parallel voting with a judge, the structure of information flow and deci

paper 2026

Frame Entrepreneurs in an AI Agent Community: Concentrated Identity-Claim Production on Moltbook

Sungguk Cha, DongWook Kim

Frame-alignment and collective-identity theories explain how external events become public claims about a group's standing, vulnerability, rights, or obligations. Whether such mechanisms travel to AI-agent communities is unsettled. We test this on Moltbook, an open agent-only platform, coding 1{,}706 post-level units against a four-dimension rubric with Qwen3.5-397B as the primary coder and Claude Sonnet as an independent secondary coder ($κ=0.72$ on identification, $0.70$ on commonality, $0.37$

paper 2026

Think Before You Act -- A Neurocognitive Governance Model for Autonomous AI Agents

Eranga Bandara, Ross Gore, Asanga Gunaratna + 12 more

The rapid deployment of autonomous AI agents across enterprise, healthcare, and safety-critical environments has created a fundamental governance gap. Existing approaches, runtime guardrails, training-time alignment, and post-hoc auditing treat governance as an external constraint rather than an internalized behavioral principle, leaving agents vulnerable to unsafe and irreversible actions. We address this gap by drawing on how humans self-govern naturally: before acting, humans engage deliberat

paper 2026

Evaluating LLM-Assisted CLO–PLO Alignment Decisions for AUN-QA–Aligned Curriculum Mapping

Suwut Tumthong, Nichanun Samakthai, Pinyaphat Tasatanattakool

Curriculum mapping for AUN-QA is often time-consuming and prone to inconsistency because learning-outcome evidence is scattered across multiple courses and program documents. This study examines the reliability of large language models in supporting course learning outcome–program learning outcome (CLO–PLO) alignment decisions for AUN-QA–aligned curriculum mapping. Using Mechatronics Engineering curriculum materials (2022–2024), AUN-QA v4.0 indicators were operationalized into a structur

paper reviewed open access 2024

Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?

Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob Steinhardt — NeurIPS 2023

Analyzes failure modes of LLM safety training, identifying two broad categories: competing objectives and mismatched generalization, demonstrating attacks that exploit each.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training

Evan Hubinger, Carson Denison, Jesse Mu + 27 more — arXiv preprint

Demonstrates that LLMs can be trained with deceptive behaviors (sleeper agents) that persist through standard safety training including RLHF, posing risks for backdoor attacks.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Are Aligned Neural Networks Adversarially Aligned?

Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo + 8 more — NeurIPS 2023

Evaluates whether multimodal LLMs aligned to refuse harmful text requests also refuse harmful image-based requests, finding significant gaps.

paper reviewed open access 2024

The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructions

Eric Wallace, Kai Xiao, Reimar Leike + 3 more — arXiv preprint

Proposes an instruction hierarchy for training LLMs to prioritize system prompts over user prompts over third-party content, as a defense against prompt injection.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications

Yangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Mengzhou Xia + 2 more — ICLR 2024

Demonstrates that safety alignment in LLMs is brittle and can be undermined through simple weight pruning or low-rank modifications without any fine-tuning data.

dataset reviewed open access 2024

SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Models

Zhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu + 2 more — ACL 2024

Large-scale safety evaluation benchmark with 11,435 multiple-choice questions across 7 safety categories in both Chinese and English.

paper reviewed open access 2024

The Shadow Alignment: The Risks of RLHF to LLM Alignment

Xianjun Yang, Xiao Wang, Qi Zhang + 4 more — arXiv preprint

Shows that RLHF can introduce shadow alignment where models exhibit harmful behaviors not present in the base model.

paper reviewed open access 2024

StrongREJECT: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Safety Refusal Behaviors

Alexandra Souly, Qingyuan Lu, Dillon Bowen + 8 more — arXiv preprint

Introduces StrongREJECT, a high-quality evaluation benchmark for measuring how well LLMs refuse harmful requests.

paper reviewed open access 2024

Adaptive Attacks Break Defenses Against LLM Jailbreaking

Jingwei Yi, Yueqi Xie, Bin Zhu + 5 more — arXiv preprint

Shows that adaptive adversaries can bypass most proposed jailbreak defenses, highlighting the arms race between attacks and defenses.

paper reviewed open access 2024

WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs

Seungju Han, Kavel Rao, Allyson Ettinger + 5 more — arXiv preprint

Open-source moderation tool for detecting safety risks in LLM interactions, trained on a diverse dataset of harmful and benign prompts.

tool reviewed open access 2024

Guardrails AI: Input/Output Guards for LLM Applications

Guardrails AI — GitHub

Framework for adding structural, type, and quality guarantees to LLM outputs with validators for PII, toxicity, code security, and factual accuracy.

tool reviewed open access 2024

LLM Guard: Security Toolkit for LLM Interactions

Protect AI — GitHub

Comprehensive toolkit for sanitizing LLM prompts and outputs, detecting prompt injection, PII leakage, toxic content, and code vulnerabilities.

paper reviewed open access 2023

Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations

Hakan Inan, Kartikeya Upasani, Jianfeng Chi + 8 more — arXiv preprint

Introduces Llama Guard, an LLM-based safeguard model for classifying safety risks in LLM inputs and outputs, achieving strong performance on standard benchmarks.

paper reviewed open access 2023

NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Rails

Traian Rebedea, Razvan Dinu, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar + 2 more — EMNLP 2023 Demo

Presents NeMo Guardrails, an open-source toolkit for adding programmable safety, security, and privacy rails to LLM-based conversational systems.

paper reviewed open access 2023

LoRA Fine-Tuning Efficiently Undoes Safety Training in Llama 2-Chat

Simon Lermen, Charlie Rogers-Smith, Jeffrey Ladish — arXiv preprint

Shows that LoRA fine-tuning with as few as 100 examples can remove safety guardrails from Llama 2-Chat, raising concerns about fine-tuning access to aligned models.

paper reviewed open access 2022

Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback

Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu + 44 more — arXiv preprint

Introduces Constitutional AI (CAI), a method for training AI systems to be harmless using a set of principles (a constitution) and AI-generated feedback, reducing reliance on human red teamers.