Skip to content

Agentic Threats

Tool misuse, autonomous harm, and agent-specific attack vectors

Resources
380
Page
3/8

Newest first

Search instead
paper2026Unreviewed

Automatically Attacking Software Reverse Engineering AI Agents

Brian Crawford, Justin Phillips, Patrick McClure

Software tools for reverse engineering executable binary files, such as Ghidra, enable malware analysts to safely conduct robust static analysis without having access to original source code. Coupled with the analytic power of large language models (LLM), agentic systems enabled…

paper2026Unreviewed

The Surface You Test Is Not the Surface That Breaks

Shifat E Arman, Syed Nazmus Sakib, Nafiul Haque +1

Tool-augmented LLM agents are vulnerable to prompt injection: a third party who controls part of the agent's context can plant instructions that the agent then executes as if they came from the user. Current evaluations report a single attack success rate per model on one…

paper2026Unreviewed

Exploring Systems-Thinking Approaches to Loss of Control Risk

Aurelio Carlucci, Sean P. Fillingham, James Walpole +1

Internal deployment of agentic AI systems for coding and research creates a sociotechnical control problem that extends beyond model behaviour. We treat internal-deployment Loss of Control as the inability to reliably constrain, audit, reverse, or halt AI-mediated changes to…

paper2026Unreviewed

SkillVetBench: LLM-as-Judge for Multi-Dimensional Security Risk Evaluation in Open-Source LLM Agent Skills

Ismail Hossain, Sai Puppala, Md Jahangir Alam +2

Open-source LLM agent ecosystems are growing rapidly, yet the security of community-contributed skills - modular tool definitions that extend agent capabilities - remains largely unvetted. The gap we fill: existing scanners operate at the code layer and are structurally blind to…

paper2026Unreviewed

The Gate Is Only as Honest as Its Contracts: ContractGuard for the Contract Layer of Risk-Aware Causal Gating

Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer, Rahul Suresh Babu

Risk-Aware Causal Gating (RACG) defends tool-augmented LLM agents against indirect prompt injection by removing dangerous tools from the agent's visible action space, so that even a fully injection-compliant agent cannot call a tool it cannot see. We make three points. First,…

paper2026Unreviewed

Resilient Consensus in Agentic AI

Sribalaji C. Anand, George J. Pappas

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in multi-agent systems where they must coordinate and agree on shared decisions. We ask whether classical resilient consensus theory, developed for deterministic agents, transfers to LLM agents that may behave…

paper2026Unreviewed

Same-Origin Policy for Agentic Browsers

Xilong Wang, Xiaoxing Chen, Patrick Li +2

Agentic browsers integrate autonomous AI agents into web browsers, enabling users to accomplish web tasks through natural-language instructions. The same-origin policy (SOP) is a fundamental browser security mechanism that prevents unauthorized automated cross-origin data flows…

paper2026Unreviewed

Adaptive Evaluation of Out-of-Band Defenses Against Prompt Injection in LLM Agents

Praneeth Narisetty, Shiva Nagendra Babu Kore, Uday Kumar Reddy Kattamanchi +1

Recent work (2024 to 2026) has converged on a strategy for defending tool-using LLM agents against indirect prompt injection: rather than training the model to refuse malicious instructions, enforce security outside the model with a deterministic policy that mediates the agent's…